Web Whatever point Whenever

Mike Dunn opines on the terminology. Does the phrase Web 2.0 have any meaning? Did we even know it was Web 1.0?

Who cares, sez Mike, there’s lots of cool applications and it’s becoming easier to find them all the time.

I agree with one caveat. Finding the cool and useful applications is not the problem. It’s finding the time to use them that’s the problem.

I propose for Web 3.0 we move to a 30 hour day. And make everything simple enough for a three year old to understand so my daughters can use AJAX, social media, microformats, structured blogging, etc., etc. to fill their own damn sippy cups!

Technorati Tags:

If you like what you read, please share:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • MySpace
  • Netvibes
  • NewsVine
  • Ping.fm
  • Tumblr
  • YahooMyWeb

Random Posts

  • You know, AJAX is the new black! Mike is right, but the Web 2.0 name just smells of VC branding because dotcom has such bad connotations.

    How about stuff that people really need? That can be Web 2.5!!
  • Ah ha ha. David, if you can pull off the switch to a 30 hour day, you'll be my hero forever. I've been doing the 30 hour day most of my life, and it would be lovely if I had more company as my personal schedule jumps around the clock.
  • Please put me on the beta invite list for that auto apple juice filler app. If it has the sippy cup plugger baked into the architecture and I no longer have to do a tab a/slot b marriage and fiddle through the drawer for an eternity in the middle of the night, then I think you've just made my life substantially better.

    I will even sponsor SippyCupCAMP if this thing flies.
blog comments powered by Disqus



SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline