<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:icbm="http://www.postneo.com/icbm/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To twitter or not to twitter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/</link>
	<description>Public Relations, Social Media and Ephemera Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:15:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive Armitage</title>
		<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-80288</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive Armitage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 23:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/#comment-80288</guid>
		<description>David

Firstly, thanks for recognizing that I&#039;m a big boy although it is something my Mum has been telling me a number of years now .  But I&#039;ll confess, I&#039;m a little taken aback by your response to me querying the potential value of Twitter.  Maybe you were having a bad day.  Please take the time to read the post again and you may conclude (as Tom does) that I&#039;m asking a simple question - I&#039;m not &#039;getting&#039; Twitter so can people help me &#039;get&#039; it.  And I&#039;m not, as you assert, trivialising the issue in any way.  Lastly, I always thought sloppy writing and mis-spelling was more likely to be the the death of our industry rather than questioning which new communications channels may make it or not...

Clive</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David</p>
<p>Firstly, thanks for recognizing that I&#8217;m a big boy although it is something my Mum has been telling me a number of years now .  But I&#8217;ll confess, I&#8217;m a little taken aback by your response to me querying the potential value of Twitter.  Maybe you were having a bad day.  Please take the time to read the post again and you may conclude (as Tom does) that I&#8217;m asking a simple question &#8211; I&#8217;m not &#8216;getting&#8217; Twitter so can people help me &#8216;get&#8217; it.  And I&#8217;m not, as you assert, trivialising the issue in any way.  Lastly, I always thought sloppy writing and mis-spelling was more likely to be the the death of our industry rather than questioning which new communications channels may make it or not&#8230;</p>
<p>Clive</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Parmet</title>
		<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-73642</link>
		<dc:creator>David Parmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:49:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/#comment-73642</guid>
		<description>Clive&#039;s a big boy - and I for one have heard way too many PR people (and worse, agency heads) say things like &quot;I don&#039;t get it&quot; and dismiss things like blogging or podcasting out of hand. 

Just because a particular form of communications might seem trivial to you, doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s trivial. That attitude is going to be the death of our industry...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clive&#8217;s a big boy &#8211; and I for one have heard way too many PR people (and worse, agency heads) say things like &#8220;I don&#8217;t get it&#8221; and dismiss things like blogging or podcasting out of hand. </p>
<p>Just because a particular form of communications might seem trivial to you, doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s trivial. That attitude is going to be the death of our industry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Murphy</title>
		<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-73595</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 18:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/#comment-73595</guid>
		<description>David,

I have to say I&#039;m surprised and a little disapointed with this post.

To call someone out for expressing an opinion, or asking why this stuff is so important, is a little harsh IMHO.

Clive is asking the question - getting into the conversation.

I think you were a little rash.


Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>I have to say I&#8217;m surprised and a little disapointed with this post.</p>
<p>To call someone out for expressing an opinion, or asking why this stuff is so important, is a little harsh IMHO.</p>
<p>Clive is asking the question &#8211; getting into the conversation.</p>
<p>I think you were a little rash.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris</title>
		<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-71679</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parmet.net/pr/2007/03/26/to-twitter-or-not-to-twitter/#comment-71679</guid>
		<description>Good call David! Heh, &quot;To Twitter or not to twitter&quot;. I like that. Blogging last week I then realized the post I was writing was short and personal, completely deserving of a  twitter. I said to myself... &quot;better twitter this&quot; -- then thought it was completely hilarious that the word twitter is now used as a verb in direct conjunction with the beloved Twitter service. Now I can &quot;twitter&quot; my &quot;internet friends&quot; even from my &quot;cell phone&quot;. So many things are coming together-- its like a revelation! Haha!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good call David! Heh, &#8220;To Twitter or not to twitter&#8221;. I like that. Blogging last week I then realized the post I was writing was short and personal, completely deserving of a  twitter. I said to myself&#8230; &#8220;better twitter this&#8221; &#8212; then thought it was completely hilarious that the word twitter is now used as a verb in direct conjunction with the beloved Twitter service. Now I can &#8220;twitter&#8221; my &#8220;internet friends&#8221; even from my &#8220;cell phone&#8221;. So many things are coming together&#8211; its like a revelation! Haha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
