<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:icbm="http://www.postneo.com/icbm/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OnMedia &#8211; KPMG Survey</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/01/29/onmedia-kpmg-survey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/01/29/onmedia-kpmg-survey/</link>
	<description>Public Relations, Social Media and Ephemera Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:15:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David Parmet</title>
		<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/01/29/onmedia-kpmg-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-255195</link>
		<dc:creator>David Parmet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 15:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/01/29/onmedia-kpmg-survey/#comment-255195</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just quoting the survey....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just quoting the survey&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/01/29/onmedia-kpmg-survey/comment-page-1/#comment-255190</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 14:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/01/29/onmedia-kpmg-survey/#comment-255190</guid>
		<description>With regards to your last comment about &quot;the return or benefits of online advertising vs. traditional channels&quot; -- I think you have introduced some confusion yourself.

After all, &quot;traditional&quot; (i.e. banner-based) online advertising has been proven VERY effective over the last 10 years as that market has now matured.  It can even be argued that banner-based online advertising is now a &quot;traditional channel&quot;, by your inferred definition of the terms.

What hasn&#039;t (yet?) been proven effective is how new forms of online advertising will work, and I suspect you&#039;re right in your assessment: advertising on these new social media sites won&#039;t be nearly as valuable as many seem to think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards to your last comment about &#8220;the return or benefits of online advertising vs. traditional channels&#8221; &#8212; I think you have introduced some confusion yourself.</p>
<p>After all, &#8220;traditional&#8221; (i.e. banner-based) online advertising has been proven VERY effective over the last 10 years as that market has now matured.  It can even be argued that banner-based online advertising is now a &#8220;traditional channel&#8221;, by your inferred definition of the terms.</p>
<p>What hasn&#8217;t (yet?) been proven effective is how new forms of online advertising will work, and I suspect you&#8217;re right in your assessment: advertising on these new social media sites won&#8217;t be nearly as valuable as many seem to think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
