<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:icbm="http://www.postneo.com/icbm/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton is from PR, Obama is from Social Media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/02/20/clinton-is-from-pr-obama-is-from-social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/02/20/clinton-is-from-pr-obama-is-from-social-media/</link>
	<description>Public Relations, Social Media and Ephemera Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:02:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: sex toys</title>
		<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/02/20/clinton-is-from-pr-obama-is-from-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-372212</link>
		<dc:creator>sex toys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 12:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/02/20/clinton-is-from-pr-obama-is-from-social-media/#comment-372212</guid>
		<description>thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/02/20/clinton-is-from-pr-obama-is-from-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-264932</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 13:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/02/20/clinton-is-from-pr-obama-is-from-social-media/#comment-264932</guid>
		<description>I believe the analogy is apt and I completely agree with you around the use of micro trends.  However I&#039;m still left wondering if it truly can be &#039;social media engagement&#039; when there is little to no interaction back from the candidate or even the candidate&#039;s people.  Is Obama using social media tools in a better way to raise money and create community awareness for himself; yes! Will he continue to engage with that community in this manner after he is elected President; not sure.  And therein lies the rub for me since social media is continuous and evolving, not one-way and abruptly ends when the person gets what they want.

Perhaps I&#039;m being too literal in this regard or simply pessimistic?  Either way, thanks for getting my brain functioning this morning!

/kff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe the analogy is apt and I completely agree with you around the use of micro trends.  However I&#8217;m still left wondering if it truly can be &#8217;social media engagement&#8217; when there is little to no interaction back from the candidate or even the candidate&#8217;s people.  Is Obama using social media tools in a better way to raise money and create community awareness for himself; yes! Will he continue to engage with that community in this manner after he is elected President; not sure.  And therein lies the rub for me since social media is continuous and evolving, not one-way and abruptly ends when the person gets what they want.</p>
<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m being too literal in this regard or simply pessimistic?  Either way, thanks for getting my brain functioning this morning!</p>
<p>/kff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
