<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:icbm="http://www.postneo.com/icbm/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can We Get More Annoying?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/10/23/can-we-get-more-annoying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/10/23/can-we-get-more-annoying/</link>
	<description>Public Relations, Social Media and Ephemera Since 2005</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 06:15:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hamilton</title>
		<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/10/23/can-we-get-more-annoying/comment-page-1/#comment-357348</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hamilton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:33:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/10/23/can-we-get-more-annoying/#comment-357348</guid>
		<description>First of all -- if taking a picture, uploading it to your website, writing about it and publishing it isn&#039;t &quot;engagement&quot; I&#039;m not sure what is. ;-)

But I get what you&#039;re saying.

Still, advertising will never truly change because the target (the human mind) is largely unchanged over the last, oh, several hundred years... or more.

Branding by association (or &quot;interruption&quot;) is still a very valid way of increasing both awareness and perceived value of one&#039;s product. Doing so in a targeted sense where the context is relevant is a (much needed!) bonus.  Engagement then adds to this in a very big way, as is evidenced here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all &#8212; if taking a picture, uploading it to your website, writing about it and publishing it isn&#8217;t &#8220;engagement&#8221; I&#8217;m not sure what is. <img src='http://www.parmet.net/pr/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>But I get what you&#8217;re saying.</p>
<p>Still, advertising will never truly change because the target (the human mind) is largely unchanged over the last, oh, several hundred years&#8230; or more.</p>
<p>Branding by association (or &#8220;interruption&#8221;) is still a very valid way of increasing both awareness and perceived value of one&#8217;s product. Doing so in a targeted sense where the context is relevant is a (much needed!) bonus.  Engagement then adds to this in a very big way, as is evidenced here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Ng</title>
		<link>http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/10/23/can-we-get-more-annoying/comment-page-1/#comment-357295</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Ng</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.parmet.net/pr/2008/10/23/can-we-get-more-annoying/#comment-357295</guid>
		<description>interruption is still the default model because the type of person that would be eating at a mall food court and be surprised at the great ad opportunity on mall food court tables are not savvy enough to understand engagement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>interruption is still the default model because the type of person that would be eating at a mall food court and be surprised at the great ad opportunity on mall food court tables are not savvy enough to understand engagement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
